Checkpoints in PostgreSQL: Ensuring Data Integrity and Performance

What are checkpoints?

Checkpoints in PostgreSQL are crucial for maintaining data integrity and optimizing performance. They involve several key operations:

User makes shared buffers dirty, at checkpoin a block is written to disk.

1. Write all dirty buffers: Dirty buffers are memory pages modified but not yet written to disk. A checkpoint ensures all these pages are written.
2. Mark the dirty shared buffer as clean: Once the dirty buffers are written to disk, they are marked as clean in the shared buffer.
3. Mark the write-ahead-log (WAL) as applied: The WAL records are marked as applied, ensuring all changes are securely stored.

When a checkpoint occurs, all new writes since the previous checkpoint are written to disk. This guarantees that in case of a database crash, all data up to the latest checkpoint is safely stored on disk, and PostgreSQL can recover up to the latest checkpoint.

While the current checkpoint takes place, all the “green” write are written to disk.

Strategies for Setting Checkpoints

PostgreSQL offers several strategies to configure checkpoints:

1. checkpoint_flush_after

This parameter determines after how many pages the accumulated data is flushed to disk. For example, setting this to 5 means that after 5 blocks are accumulated, the data is flushed.

2. checkpoint_timeout

This parameter sets the time interval between checkpoints. For instance, setting it to 5 minutes ensures a checkpoint occurs every 5 minutes.

3. checkpoint_completion_target

This parameter manages the duration of checkpoint completion. It tells PostgreSQL how quickly it should try to finish the checkpoint in each iteration. The default value is 0.5, meaning PostgreSQL aims to complete the checkpoint in half the time before the next one.

Impact of Checkpoint Configuration

In a heavily loaded environment with many writes, shared buffers (e.g., 16 GB) can fill up rapidly. Configuring checkpoint parameters appropriately is crucial:

• Low Values: Setting values too low can result in high disk throughput, rendering the buffer mechanism ineffective. This can lead to frequent disk writes, increasing I/O operations and potentially slowing down the database.

Low values can lead to high throughput.

• High Values: Conversely, setting values too high can lower disk throughput but increase I/O peaks. This can make the database work harder during peaks, affecting overall performance and impacting users performing other queries. Additionally, high checkpoint values can result in longer recovery times. For critical systems, checkpoints must be frequent enough to ensure quick recovery.

High values can lead to High peaks, and harder to recover

Balancing Checkpoint Completion Target

The checkpoint_completion_target helps balance peaks and throughput. It instructs PostgreSQL on the proportion of the checkpoint interval to complete the checkpoint process. For example, a default value of 0.5 indicates that PostgreSQL should finish the checkpoint in half the time between checkpoints. Adjusting this value can help manage I/O peaks and ensure smooth database performance.

checkpoint_completion_target — aims to complete the checkpoint in half the time before the next one.

Conclusion

Configuring checkpoints in PostgreSQL requires a delicate balance between performance and data integrity. Understanding the impact of parameters like checkpoint_flush_after, checkpoint_timeout, and checkpoint_completion_target is essential for optimizing database operations. Properly set checkpoints ensure that in case of a crash, data is securely stored and the system can recover efficiently.

Buy me a coffee